You will get the unvarnished truth from entrenched instructors at liberal institutions of higher learning, especially those institutions that are hostile to the free thinkers in their midst.

Er … won’t … you?


Posted in Food for Thought | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Ontarians: feeling manipulated?

Premier Wynne’s constant concessions in the waning days of the Ontario election should give you a clue.

Saying she won’t win tomorrow’s election shows she:

  • doesn’t respect the voter
  • doesn’t respect the election process
  • doesn’t respect the Ontario Liberal Party
  • doesn’t respect democracy

It shows how polls dominate an election and how they are used to manipulate the voter.

The only group as obsessed about polls as politicians is the newstainment media.  They drool at the prospect of summoning their omnipotent soothsaying powers to predict the outcome of an election.  One would-be Sylvia Browne channeler said yesterday, “it’s really hard to know what the undecided voters will do.”  You don’t say…maybe that’s why they are called—undecided!

It’s time to remember the poll on election day is the only poll that deserves your attention.

Do you need some eleventh hour manipulation-free enlightenment before voting?




Posted in Food for Thought, Newstainment Media Behaviour | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Extra billing: okay and not okay


Chart summary transfer

Day Care Notes

Disability tax credit form

Driver’s D.O.T. physical exam & form

Immunization Record

Insurance Disability Forms

Life Insurance Death Certificate

Newborn circumcision

Off work/school note

School/Camp form

Skin Lesions

T.B. Skin Test

Telephone Advice

Travel Cancellation Insurance Form

Travel Immunization



Pap Smear


Prescription for eye injection

Prescription renewals

Procedures that are a normal, regular part of medical care, such as prescription renewals, should not be extra-billed.  Likewise, neither should procedures that are preventative or curative, such as a pap smear or physio.  A prescription for an eye injection (macular degeneration) or any other prescription applicable to a procedure that is covered by OHIP should not be extra-billed.


Posted in Government Behaviour | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Who decides an election?


Newstainment Media


Special Interest Groups


Ontarians! Have you noticed that polling is still going on since 9th May when the writ was drawn up to mark the start of the official election campaign?  What are you going to do about?  Will you refuse to take part in a poll?  Will you contact Elections Ontario and voice your concern?

To respect democracy and the voter, the only poll that should be permitted during the official campaign is the THE poll on election day!


Posted in Food for Thought, Newstainment Media Behaviour | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Rain Man vs. reality

“Too often the mental health-care system has not grown to meet the different and complex challenges (of people with developmental disabilities) that such ailments impose in adolescence and adulthood.”1

It’s fascinating that CAMH’s new Centre for Adult Neurodevelopmental Disabilities and Mental Health says the need to focus on people with developmental disabilities who have mental health issues has long been ignored.  Once-upon-a-time Ontario’s regional centres cared for those with mental health issues.  You may recall some of them:

  • Huronia Regional Centre
  • Midwestern Regional Centre
  • Oxford Regional Centre
  • Rideau Regional Centre
  • Southwestern Regional Centre

When the care of people with developmental disabilities in Ontario fell under The Ministry of Health there was an appropriate understanding (caregivers were learning) of how age plays a role in these people’s lives.  Did you know that a variety of health-care professionals, including a psychiatrist and a psychologist were on staff at regional centres?

That was until the Ontario Liberal government sealed the fate of regional centres by closing them by 2009.   In the process they enabled a well scripted, choreographed and funded (with your tax dollars) smear campaign of centres to legitimize their actions.

The origins of the myopic view of centres dates back to the 1970s when the “community living” panacea and its close cousin the panacea of choice started to cloud thinking.  Social workers apparently knew more than medical professionals and gave the impression that social integration (the involvement of centre residents in their neighbouring community didn’t cut it) would get rid of that annoying disability.  Consequently, The Ministry of Community and Social Services took over the developmental disabilities file from The Ministry of Health.  Rational and pragmatic thought started to take a backseat to pushing the politically correct, “community living” panacea for people with a developmental disability.

The poster-child for the movement was the individual who had a mild developmental disability.  The perception was created, but untrue in the modernized centre, that such a person was locked away and isolated in the dreaded institution, Hollywoodized by Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man.

“There are two critical gaps,” says Dr. Yona Lunsky, head of CAMH’s new centre.  “One is that there is very little research being done on the mental health of adults with neurodevelopmental disabilities.”

Lack of research?  Given the close working relationship between staff at regional centres, there is a history of rational and pragmatic ways of working with a variety of developmental disabilities.  This includes people with a dual diagnosis (a developmental disability and a mental health issue).

The other, Lunsky says, is that mental health-care workers have not been trained to deal with differences in the psychiatric issues faced by these populations.  Again, the psychiatrist and psychologist at a centre gave front-line workers an invaluable resource of knowledge to draw on.

Lunsky sited ongoing stigma, social isolation, chronic unemployment and poverty as factors that loom large in the reality of many disabled people and can take a severe toll on mental health.

This is reprehensible because for decades the “community living” zealots have sung the same chorus:  “institutions isolate people.”  Now we learn that they are isolated in group homes and family homes.  Do you need more evidence that the “community living” panacea is an unmitigated disaster in Ontario?  The ombudsman’s office reported in 2016 that almost 50% of the 62,000 adults with a developmental disability languish on waiting lists for critical services.2

Too many politicians of all stripes and entrenched bureaucrats have blindly followed the “community living” panacea.  They have lost sight of the big picture.  Can you imagine how the regional centres could by now be centres of excellence, as the following petition called for (one of hundreds of similar recommendations the Ontario Liberals ignored before closing the doors)?

“Mr. Garfield Dunlop (Simcoe North):  “To the Legislative Assembly of Ontario:

“Whereas Dalton McGuinty and his Liberal government were elected based on their promise to rebuild public services in Ontario;

“Whereas the Minister of Community and Social Services has announced plans to close Huronia Regional Centre, home to people with developmental disabilities, many of whom have multiple diagnoses and severe problems that cannot be met in the community;

“Whereas closing Huronia Regional Centre will have a devastating impact on residents with developmental disabilities, their families, the developmental services sector and the economies of the local communities;

“Whereas Ontario could use the professional staff and facilities of HRC to extend specialized services, support and professional training to many more clients who live in the community, in partnership with families and community agencies;

“We, the undersigned, petition the Legislative Assembly of Ontario to direct the government to keep Huronia Regional Centre, home to people with developmental disabilities, open, and to transform them into ‘centres of excellence’ to provide specialized services and support to Ontarians with developmental needs, no matter where they live.”

I’m pleased to sign my name to that.”3

These centres of excellence are where people with severe disabilities could live and those with mild issues could access day programs.  Centres of excellence could be extraordinary resources to help alleviate the devastating strain on mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers and guardians.

In their pre-election budget in March, the Ontario Liberals announced a promise of $2 Billion for people languishing on waiting lists.  This eleventh-hour, come-to-Jesus moment rings hollow because they have been in office for 15 years.  To just throw taxpayers’ dollars at a misguided system is equally suspect.

The words of Dr. Gifford-Jones come to mind: “The problems of society are caused by supposedly intelligent people who are largely fools.”




3. Facts and Highlights from:


Posted in Government Behaviour, Responsible and Accountable Expenditures | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Social engineers prefer us to be Cousin Itts

Service Canada doesn’t want its staff to refer to people as:  a Father, or a Mother.  They cannot call a man Sir, or a woman Madam.  Is it any wonder society has mental health issues when the social engineers have free rein.

The upside is we’ll save a lot on hair cuts.


Posted in Government Behaviour | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Grand River Conservation Authority wants more of your money

In the wake of the Brantford, Ontario flooding, it’s stunning how the GRCA has the audacity to ask for more taxpayers’ dollars.  In the 2018 budget passed on 23 February, another $3M+ is supposedly needed to, among other tasks, “reduce flood damage.”

This should read prevent flood damage.

If the GRCA couldn’t do its job within the 2017 budget, how will throwing more of your money into the mix ensure that they will do their job in 2018?

P.S. How are they coming along with the other GRCA responsibility: the Mohawk Lake clean up?


Posted in Government Behaviour, Responsible and Accountable Expenditures | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Amazon, Facebook, Google: too big?

On May 15, 1911, the US Supreme Court ruled that Standard Oil was an “unreasonable” monopoly under the Sherman Antitrust Act.  It ordered Standard to break up into 34 independent companies.

Mr. Dave Hodges and Dr. Michael Savage muse that Amazon, Facebook and Google are the “Standard Oils” of today and ask the question:  Is it time to break them up?



Posted in Business Behaviour | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

FYI MPPs: the contract with your constituents ends June 8, 2018

It appears some MPPs, such as Dr. Eric Hoskins, are unaware that the 41st Legislative Assembly of Ontario is still very much alive and kicking.  You constituents who put your MPP in their seat have an unwritten contract with that MPP.  It states that he or she is elected to serve the full term, unless health reasons make this impossible.

Did Dr. Hoskins ask his St. Paul’s constituents if they would accept his resignation?

Posted in Government Behaviour | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Time to say toodaloo monopolizers

Have you checked your phone bill lately?

Have you checked if they got the taxes right?

It maybe a herculean tax task for your phone company if you use a third-party long distance provider.  The taxes maybe too rich by two, three, five or more cents.  Hmm, how many accountants and MBAs do they employ?  You can contact customer service if you enjoy the bouncing life of a volleyball, with no positive result.  You can pay the correct amount and ignore late payment fees on the tax you don’t owe and pray the phone gods will knock some sense into your phone company.

If they aren’t your favourite, it’s time to say good-bye.

Does Canada’s NAF*TA 2.0 Wish List (we haven’t seen the list, have you seen the list? there is a list, right?) includes access to all North American companies, then we may say toodaloo monopolizers.

Oh, here’s another one.

  1. Two phone landlines in a home.
  2. One is touch-tone.
  3. One is pulse dial.
  4. The once less costly pulse dial line is now the same cost as the touch-tone.
  5. The provider never alerted the customer when this occurred.
  6. The provider has yet to suggest switching the dial line to tone.

*F stands for FAIR


Posted in Business Standards | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment