“Climate-change” hoax for cash

Have you contacted your elected representatives to say that you are opposed to the spending of your tax dollars (or instituting new “fees,” i.e., taxes) on initiatives to thwart so-called “climate change?”

If not, the book linked below is a good primer because it provides essays on almost everything on the topic;  information you are unlikely to find in the public sector or reported on by the newstainment media.

Here’s a summary of the authors and their key points (with kudos to Alan Moran, editor and Amazon).

  • Ian Plimer:   “CO2 emissions will not lead to catastrophic consequences.”
  • Patrick Michaels:  “chasm between the predictions of the IPCC and the real world temperature results.”
  • Richard Lindzen:  “climate is less sensitive to increases in greenhouse gases than thought; a warmer world would have a similar weather variability to today.”
  • Willie Soon:  “discusses the often unremarked role of the sun in climate variability.”
  • Robert Carter:  “explains why the natural variability of the climate is far greater than any human component.”
  • John Abbot and Jennifer Marohasy:  “demonstrate how little success climate models have in predicting information such as rainfall.”
  • Nigel Lawson:  “warns of the dire economic consequences of abandoning the use of fossil fuels.”
  • Alan Moran:  “compares the considerable costs of taking action compared to the relatively minor potential benefits of doing so.”
  • James Delingpole:  “looks at the academic qualifications of the leading proponents of catastrophic climate change and finds many lack the credentials of so-called ‘sceptics’.”
  • Garth Paltridge:  “says science itself will be damaged by the failure of climate forecasts to eventuate.”
  • Jo Nova:  “chronicles the extraordinary sums of public money awarded to climate change activists, in contrast to those who question their alarmist warnings.”
  • Kesten Green and Scott Armstrong:  “compare climate change alarmism to previous scares raised over the past 200 years.”
  • Rupert Darwall:  “explains why an international, legally binding climate agreement has extremely minimal chances of success.”
  • Ross McKitrick:  “reviews the ‘hockey stick’ controversy and what it reveals about the state of climate science.”
  • Donna Laframboise:  “explains how activists have taken charge of the IPCC.”
  • Mark Steyn:  “recounts the embarrassing ‘Ship of Fools’ expedition to Antarctica.”
  • Christopher Essex:  “argues the climate system is far more complex and there is much that we still don’t know.”
  • Bernie Lewin:  “examines how climate change science came to be politicised.”
  • Stewart Franks:  “lists all the unexpected developments in climate science that were not foreseen.”
  • Anthony Watts:   “highlights the failure of the world to warm over the past 18 years, contrary to the predictions of the IPCC.”
  • Andrew Bolt:  “reviews the litany of failed forecasts by climate change activists.”

An informed citizen is an effective citizen.

Will you be one?


About admin

CityofInsight.com is where citizens speak out for excellence in society and governance. We are passionate about improving the places where we live, give, learn, play, and serve.
This entry was posted in Government Behaviour, Responsible and Accountable Expenditures and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.